Friday, November 30, 2012

Identity Theft - Will The IRS Delay Tax Refunds to Verify Identity?


The Internal Revenue Service should consider delaying the delivery tax refunds until taxpayers' identities are verified to combat identity theft, an advisory committee has recommended. In its 2012 annual report, the IRS Advisory Council said that for filers getting refunds in January, the IRS should consider issuing 25 percent of the refund and then send the rest only after ID verification.

The council singled out the use of identity theft to obtain refunds as a special issue. It applauded the IRS for its efforts, but said it must take more action to halt the growing problem. It noted that from the 2008 through 2012 filing season, the agency had discovered 600,000 taxpayers that had been affected by identity theft. Through mid-April 2012, the IRS stopped 325,000 questionable returns that sought $1.7 billion in refunds by utilizing filters designed to uncover such problems.

Steps taken during the 2012 filing season included the use of filters, tools to identify taxpayers with new circumstances such as a new job or bank account and enhanced use of the functionality of the Identity Protection Personal Identification Numbers for those whose identities had been stolen.

Besides recommending the delay of refunds, the council suggested that the IRS consider requiring fingerprints or other unique identifiers that could be associated with Social Security numbers used on tax returns. Fingerprinting could be performed by local police or other approved group, it said.

The council also noted the expansion of the number of individuals who are being required to have Registered Tax Preparer Identification Numbers. It said that about 500,000 individuals who are not CPAs, tax attorneys or Enrolled Agents might be unaware of their obligations under Treasury Circular 230 and the Internal Revenue Code.

These persons should be required to sign an acknowledgment that they are subject to Circular 230, the report continued. It noted that such an acknowledgment is already required with Form 2848, Power of Attorney and Declaration of Representative, which contains a declaration by the representative indicating awareness of regulations contained in Treasury Circular 230 concerning practice before the IRS.

However, the council's report said the acknowledgment for tax preparers should list activities that involve tax return preparation and advice as constituting practice before the IRS.

What do you think of the Advisory Council's suggestions? Thoughts on how the IRS can combat identity theft? Let us know in the comments section.



Security Tax Services LLC

North Sound                                       South Sound
2802 Wetmore Ave, Suite 212           33530 1st Way S, Suite 102
Everett, WA 98201                             Federal Way, WA 98003
425.339.2400                                     253.237.0751
fax 425.259.1099                               fax 253.237.0701





Thursday, November 29, 2012

Will The Estate Tax Boomerang As We Go Over The Fiscal Cliff?

   Now that the election is over, many folks are wondering what will happen with the federal estate tax. This is one of the Bush era tax cuts set to expire at the end of this year, contributing to the fiscal cliff that we are hearing so much about lately.
If Congress doesn't act in a lame-duck session, on Jan. 1, the current $5.12 million per-person exclusion from the federal estate and gift tax will automatically dip to $1 million and the tax on transfers above that amount will rise from 35% to up to 55%. Will it come to that? Perhaps temporarily, but the estate tax exemption has never gone down, and even President Obama favors a $3.5 million exemption. So while there’s a chance the exemption will fall to the $3.5 million level, more likely it will stay where it is (with any decline to $1 million fixed retroactively).

Expect Congress to also extend the special tax break for married couples that’s scheduled to go poof at the dawn of 2013. Portability, as tax geeks call it, allows widows and widowers to add any unused estate tax exclusion of the spouse who died most recently to their own. That means, depending on which exemption amount prevails, married couples together will be able to transfer a total of $7 million, or $10.24 million, tax-free.
What’s more at risk is the ability of people worth more than that to pare down their estates with lifetime gifts. The past two years have been a bonanza for them, since they had the option of shifting up to $5 million worth of assets. With cute tax tricks, a lot more than that could be transferred. Congress could well let the lifetime gift tax exemption fall back to $1 million.
From an estate planning perspective, lifetime gifts have always had an advantage over passing assets when you die. Such gifts leave less in your estate for the government to tax, and if the assets increase in value after you have passed them along, you will not owe gift tax on the appreciation. So for the super rich, a drastic drop in the tax-free amount is a huge loss.
Most of us will never come close to using this exemption, however. One reason is that without incurring gift tax or eating into the lifetime exemption, you can give up to $13,000 each year to as many recipients as you like. Couples can combine this annual exclusion to jointly give $26,000. For example, this year a married couple with a child who is married and has two children could make a joint cash gift of $26,000 to the adult child, the child’s spouse and each grandchild – four people – providing the family with $104,000 a year. Starting in 2013, the annual exclusion for gifts goes up to $14,000 ($28,000 per couple).
If you’re rich enough–and generous enough–to care about the lifetime exemption, get ready not only for the limit to drop, but also for Congress to whittle away at most of the tax tricks that “leverage,” or pack even more into, the tax-free amount. This is not likely to happen during the lame-duck Congress, or even as part of comprehensive estate planning legislation. Rather, it will probably surface as Congress looks to raise revenue to offset specific expenditures.
So watch out for those transportation funding bills, where sneaky lawmakers in the past came close to nullifying a long-time favorite–the grantor retained annuity trust or GRAT, which involves putting appreciating assets into a short-term irrevocable trust (two years is typical) and retaining the right to receive an annual income stream for the term of the trust. 
President Obama’s proposed budget for 2013, issued last February, gives us a clear idea of what he would like to do. And it’s not a pretty picture for rich folks or the wealth management industry. The Green Book, as it is called, downloads here as a pdf

Article originally published on Forbes by Deborah L. Jacobs

    Questions? We are your financial partners, and we are here to help. Give us a call today.

    Security Tax Services LLC

    North Sound                                       South Sound
    2802 Wetmore Ave, Suite 212           33530 1st Way S, Suite 102
    Everett, WA 98201                             Federal Way, WA 98003
    425.339.2400                                     253.237.0751
    fax 425.259.1099                               fax 253.237.0701




Wednesday, November 28, 2012

More Info on IRS Announcing 2013 Standard Mileage Rates

The other day we shared the IRS posting on 2013 Standard Mileage Rates, and we wanted to talk a little bit more on the issue.

If you feel like gas prices have been edging up, it’s not your imagination. Prices have increased since last year and the IRS has taken notice. Beginning January 1, 2013, the standard mileage rates will increase slightly to:
No, the last line isn't a mistake. It’s still 14 cents per mile for charity. While business miles and medical/moving miles are adjusted each year for inflation, the mileage rates for charity must be changed by Congress. And you know how effective Congress is… the rate hasn't changed since the Clinton years.
Remember, however, that you aren't required to use the standard mileage rates: you have the option of calculating the actual costs of operating your car. Whether you use the standard mileage rates or the actual costs, the devil is in the details. To substantiate your deductions, remember to keep good records. 


    Questions? We are your financial partners, and we are here to help. Give us a call today.

    Security Tax Services LLC

    North Sound                                       South Sound
    2802 Wetmore Ave, Suite 212           33530 1st Way S, Suite 102
    Everett, WA 98201                             Federal Way, WA 98003
    425.339.2400                                     253.237.0751
    fax 425.259.1099                               fax 253.237.0701

Tuesday, November 27, 2012

Failure to enact AMT patch could push start of tax season to March for millions, IRS warns -


   As the end of the year approaches, media attention is focused on the “fiscal cliff,” but a much more immediate result of Congress’s inaction threatens the 2013 filing season: the alternative minimum tax (AMT) patch, which expired at the end of 2011. The IRS warns that the start of tax season could be delayed for millions of taxpayers if the AMT patch is not enacted by the end of the year.

The problem is serious enough that the acting IRS commissioner, Steven T. Miller, wrote a letter to Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., chair of the Senate Finance Committee, on Nov. 13, 2012. The IRS Oversight Board followed up with a second letter on Nov. 19, urging Congress to act and saying, “We do not believe that the IRS has ever faced such a formidable operational risk.”

For 2011, the AMT exemption amount was $48,450 for single taxpayers and $74,450 for married taxpayers filing jointly. At that level, 4 million taxpayers paid AMT for 2011, according to Miller. Without the patch for this year, however, the exemption reverted to $33,750 for individuals and $45,000 for married filing jointly, which, the IRS estimates, will cause 28 million more taxpayers to be subject to the tax, giving them a much larger tax liability than they had anticipated. The IRS also noted that the ordering rules that dictate how tax credits apply to regular income tax and AMT have also expired and need to be fixed as well.

Because twice in the past when the AMT patch has expired, it has been reinstated retroactively, the IRS made the decision this year to maintain its tax filing systems “as-is” for the 2013 filing season. As a result, if the AMT patch and tax credit ordering rules are not enacted, the IRS warns of significant delays in the upcoming filing season. The programming changes it would have to make to its processing systems would mean it would have to notify 60 million taxpayers that they may not file a tax return or receive a refund until late in March 2013 and possibly later.

A lesser problem, but one that still may cause delays in the 2013 filing season, is the expiration of a number of special tax breaks, including the educators’ deduction for classroom expenses. Miller noted that these deductions were reinstated late in the year in 2010 (mid-December), which delayed the 2011 filing season by four weeks for 9 million taxpayers while the IRS made the necessary changes. Having to deal with similar issues this year will cause inconvenience and delay for a large number of taxpayers, but would be much more manageable than the problems caused by failing to act on the AMT, Miller said.

NOVEMBER 20, 2012

Security Tax Services LLC

North Sound                                       South Sound
2802 Wetmore Ave, Suite 212           33530 1st Way S, Suite 102
Everett, WA 98201                             Federal Way, WA 98003
425.339.2400                                     253.237.0751
fax 425.259.1099                               fax 253.237.0701


Monday, November 26, 2012

2013 Standard Mileage Rates Up 1 Cent per Mile -


The Internal Revenue Service today issued the 2013 optional standard mileage rates used to calculate the deductible costs of operating an automobile for business, charitable, medical or moving purposes.

Beginning on Jan. 1, 2013, the standard mileage rates for the use of a car (also vans, pickups or panel trucks) will be:
  • 56.5 cents per mile for business miles driven
  • 24 cents per mile driven for medical or moving purposes
  • 14 cents per mile driven in service of charitable organizations
The rate for business miles driven during 2013 increases 1 cent from the 2012 rate.  The medical and moving rate is also up 1 cent per mile from the 2012 rate.

The standard mileage rate for business is based on an annual study of the fixed and variable costs of operating an automobile. The rate for medical and moving purposes is based on the variable costs.

Taxpayers always have the option of calculating the actual costs of using their vehicle rather than using the standard mileage rates.

A taxpayer may not use the business standard mileage rate for a vehicle after using any depreciation method under the Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System (MACRS) or after claiming a Section 179 deduction for that vehicle.  In addition, the business standard mileage rate cannot be used for more than four vehicles used simultaneously.

These and other requirements for a taxpayer to use a standard mileage rate to calculate the amount of a deductible business, moving, medical, or charitable expense are in Rev. Proc. 2010-51.  Notice 2012-72 contains the standard mileage rates, the amount a taxpayer must use in calculating reductions to basis for depreciation taken under the business standard mileage rate, and the maximum standard automobile cost that a taxpayer may use in computing the allowance under a fixed and variable rate plan.

IRS Issue N-2012-72 Notice information:


2013 Standard Mileage Rates

Notice 2012-72

SECTION 1. PURPOSE
            This notice provides the optional 2013 standard mileage rates for taxpayers to use in computing the deductible costs of operating an automobile for business, charitable, medical, or moving expense purposes. This notice also provides the amount taxpayers must use in calculating reductions to basis for depreciation taken under the business standard mileage rate, and the maximum standard automobile cost that may be used in computing the allowance under a fixed and variable rate (FAVR) plan.
SECTION 2. BACKGROUND
            Rev. Proc. 2010-51, 2010-51 I.R.B. 883, provides rules for computing the deductible costs of operating an automobile for business, charitable, medical, or moving expense purposes, and for substantiating, under § 274(d) of the Internal Revenue Code and § 1.274-5 of the Income Tax Regulations, the amount of ordinary and necessary business expenses of local transportation or travel away from home. Taxpayers using the standard mileage rates must comply with Rev. Proc. 2010-51. However, a taxpayer is not required to use the substantiation methods described in Rev. Proc. 2010-51, but instead may substantiate using actual allowable expense amounts if the taxpayer maintains adequate records or other sufficient evidence.
            An independent contractor conducts an annual study for the Internal Revenue Service of the fixed and variable costs of operating an automobile to determine the standard mileage rates for business, medical, and moving use reflected in this notice. The standard mileage rate for charitable use is set by § 170(i).
SECTION 2. STANDARD MILEAGE RATES
            The standard mileage rate for transportation or travel expenses is 56.5 cents per mile for all miles of business use (business standard mileage rate). See section 4 of Rev. Proc. 2010-51.
            The standard mileage rate is 14 cents per mile for use of an automobile in rendering gratuitous services to a charitable organization under § 170. See section 5 of Rev. Proc. 2010-51.
            The standard mileage rate is 24 cents per mile for use of an automobile (1) for medical care described in § 213, or (2) as part of a move for which the expenses are deductible under § 217. See section 5 of Rev. Proc. 2010-51.
SECTION 3. BASIS REDUCTION AMOUNT
            For automobiles a taxpayer uses for business purposes, the portion of the business standard mileage rate treated as depreciation is 21 cents per mile for 2009,
23 cents per mile for 2010, 22 cents per mile for 2011, 23 cents per mile for 2012, and 23 cents per mile for 2013. See section 4.04 of Rev. Proc. 2010-51.
SECTION 4. MAXIMUM STANDARD AUTOMOBILE COST
            For purposes of computing the allowance under a FAVR plan, the standard automobile cost may not exceed $28,100 for automobiles (excluding trucks and vans) or $29,900 for trucks and vans. See section 6.02(6) of Rev. Proc. 2010-51.
SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE DATE
            This notice is effective for (1) deductible transportation expenses paid or incurred on or after January 1, 2013, and (2) mileage allowances or reimbursements paid to an employee or to a charitable volunteer (a) on or after January 1, 2013, and (b) for transportation expenses the employee or charitable volunteer pays or incurs on or after January 1, 2013.
SECTION 6. EFFECT ON OTHER DOCUMENTS
            Notice 2012-1 is superseded.
DRAFTING INFORMATION
            The principal author of this notice is Bernard P. Harvey of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax and Accounting). For further information on this notice contact Bernard P. Harvey on (202) 622-4930 (not a toll-free call).


    Questions? We are your financial partners, and we are here to help. Give us a call today.

    Security Tax Services LLC

    North Sound                                       South Sound
    2802 Wetmore Ave, Suite 212           33530 1st Way S, Suite 102
    Everett, WA 98201                             Federal Way, WA 98003
    425.339.2400                                     253.237.0751
    fax 425.259.1099                               fax 253.237.0701


Thursday, November 22, 2012

Congress Whips Out Fat Pants As Sequestration Looms (Forbes)


The end of the world is coming. You've heard, haven’t you?
On January 2, 2013, two fiscal storms – tax increases and sequestration – will combine to make one terrifying, destructive economic mess that will completely decimate the country.
Or something like that. I know it’s going to happen because the media says so nearly every day. And I’m pretty sure Trump tweeted something like that – in between calling for a revolution – so it must be true.
The tax increases are currently under debate (if by debate, you mean that each side has dug in their heels to play a staring game). But what about sequestration? It sounds terrible. And it’s hard to pronounce which makes it sound more terrible. But here’s what it is: it’s an arbitrary line in the sand.
In 1985, the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Deficit Reduction Act (GRHDRA) created the notion of sequestration. The idea is that if spending exceed revenues in the budget, spending should automatically be cut. Shocking stuff, right?
Of course, spending always exceeds revenues. That’s how we got into this mess in the first place. But you don’t hear about sequestration because Congress has an out: it keeps raising the spending caps.
Remember this time last year? In order to ward off that immediate-world-ending crisis, President Obama raised the debt ceiling by $400 billion and then got the green light for another $500 billion for this next fiscal year. As part of the year, Congress agreed to make cuts – only they didn’t say which ones (they did agree that Medicare and Social Security will not be affected). That was left to a special “super committee” who, despite a flurry of activity and a lot of press conferences, did absolutely nothing. The deadline for making those cuts came and went about this time last year.
But here’s the big secret (which I leaked to readers last year): it’s a fake deadline.
The deadline was created by legislation, the Budget Control Act of 2011. It wasn’t handed down on stone tablets on Mt. Sinai and it isn’t a part of the Constitution. It’s simply a public law. It was voted in by Congress and – here’s the fun part of Congress being Congress – it can be voted out by Congress.
And I’m betting it will be. No, not a wholesale elimination. But incremental changes. Congress simply isn’t going to allow those across the board changes.
Don’t believe me? Despite the hype, there have been signs for a bit that a total sequestration isn’t going to happen. Last year, Sen. Pat Toomey (R-PA), a member of the super committee, suggested that across the board cuts was a bad idea since it would affect military spending (the military remains optimistic). Post-election season, House Speaker Boehner (R-OH) and President Obama have been talking compromise. And even the report released by the Office of Management and Budget  (downloads as a pdf) stated that cuts would result “if the sequestration were to occur…”
If. If. If.
Last year I likened those spending cuts to a bad diet. I stand by that analogy. The sequestration limits are like your goal weight. Congress keeps swearing they won’t get there and yet, they keep reaching for another pumpkin cupcake after dinner. It’s easy enough to move that line. What’s one more pound? Or a few billion extra in spending? Because if you keep moving the number, it will be okay. And that’s what’s going to happen.
After Thanksgiving, I say Congress is whipping out the fat pants. You just watch.
Article originally published on Forbes by Kelly Phillips Erb


Security Tax Services LLC

North Sound                                       South Sound
2802 Wetmore Ave, Suite 212           33530 1st Way S, Suite 102
Everett, WA 98201                             Federal Way, WA 98003
425.339.2400                                     253.237.0751
fax 425.259.1099                               fax 253.237.0701




Wednesday, November 21, 2012

Tax Implications of the Zombie Apocalypse! -

Adam Chodorow, a Professor of Law at Arizona State University published a paper titled, “Death and Taxes and Zombies,” which details the significant problems our government will have regarding tax policy once the undead begin trolling the earth, feasting on the brains of the living.
Over the course of a twenty-five-page paper, Chodorow analyses some of the issues that governments would face if the dead were to rise up and walk amongst the living. Here are just a few that he tackles:
For Tax Purposes, Are Zombies Dead?
Chodorow has pored over all of the relevant zombie literature, and points out that there are really two kinds of zombies. The first, which originates in Haitian voodoo, are corpses that have been reanimated by sorcerers, and controlled by them for nefarious purposes. According to Chodorow, these zombies should not be considered alive by the government for tax purposes.
However, another group of zombies, the so-called “self motivated” kind, would have to be considered alive if those in a vegetative state are also considered alive, as they are by state laws in the U.S. Writes Chodorow:
“Most self-motivated zombies likely would be considered alive under most state law definitions. Such zombies must have a biological mechanism by which they think and move.”
But what if the transition to a zombie state isn't seamless. What if a person is dead for a while before they become a zombie? The law, writes, Chodorow, is silent on such issues. And of course, this opens up a whole can of worms with regards to reanimation in general. What if we unfreeze Walt Disney or Ted Williams at some point in the future and give them fresh impetus? Do they get their estates and social security numbers back? Again, the law is silent on such urgent questions.
Can We Levy Income Taxes on the Undead?
Zombies aren’t thought of as an industrious bunch, but according to Chodorow “zombies have been known to return to the places where they used to work.” Zombies may also accrue unearned income, from property or other assets, and “Higher functioning zombies might also acquire income producing assets, though that seems a stretch,” he writes. Even if governments decide that zombies aren’t alive, income-producing zombies would have to be taxed because the income couldn’t be attributed to any other person. Of course, getting zombies to pay the taxes could be a problem, as “most zombies would likely find it difficult to grasp the notion that they owe taxes, let alone fill out their returns . . . Congress will need to consider whether the projected revenue from taxing zombies is worth the administrative hassle of including such income in the tax base.”
On the other hand, vampires are, like zombies, undead, but unlike zombies, they retain their faculties of intelligence and dexterity. For this reason, Chodorow suggests that if Congress were to exempt zombies from income taxes for administrative reasons, that it should not make the exemption too broad as to exclude vampires from the tax as well.
You may have thought that your biggest problem after the zombie apocalypse would be protecting your delicious brains and those of your loved ones. But as Chorodrow points out, “A zombie apocalypse will create an urgent need for significant government revenues to protect the living, while at the same time rendering a large portion of the taxpaying public dead or undead.” Then again, with much of the population brain-coveting, soulless corpses, Medicare outlays would probably drop significantly too. And hey: What better opportunity than a zombie apocalypse to get our congressmen working together again? Maybe they’ll be able to solve the fiscal cliff while they’re at it.

 Check out and enjoy the professor's paper Death and Taxes and Zombies,” here

We hope everyone has a great holiday weekend! 


Security Tax Services LLC

North Sound                                       South Sound
2802 Wetmore Ave, Suite 212           33530 1st Way S, Suite 102
Everett, WA 98201                             Federal Way, WA 98003
425.339.2400                                     253.237.0751
fax 425.259.1099                               fax 253.237.0701

Tuesday, November 20, 2012

Happy Thanksgiving! Holiday Hours & What The Taxman Gives Thanks for!


Happy Thanksgiving from our family to yours!
Our offices will be closed from Wednesday, November 21st through the weekend, coming back to work from our post-turkey comas Monday the 26th. We hope you all enjoy your feasts and family! We know the Taxman will be enjoying the festivities with you;
Thanksgiving tax revenue
Image source: Venice2point0.blogspot.com
As you prepare to lay out a feast for your family to celebrate Thanksgiving, I’m sure you think about what you’re thankful for. But have you ever thought how happy the holiday makes the taxman? Me neither. Instead, I’m usually focused on my family.
He’s thankful that we spend billions of taxable dollars celebrating the turkey-fueled holiday. Consider what you spend and how much of it is taxable and you’ll quickly see that the federal and state revenuers may be even more thankful than we are – with good cause. Consider these fast facts about what aspects of your Turkey Day are a tax boon:
Thanksgiving travel costs
Image source: NYDailyNews.com
Travel Costs - This year gas costs are up and airfare as well. Airfare costs are up 9% over last year and if you wait too long to book, it could tack $100 on each leg of your flight. The average Thanksgiving flight fare runs $386-$600 and 15% of this is made up of taxes according to a MIT study. And even if you eschew air travel in favor of the good old family road trip, you may avoid long lines at airport security, but you won’t avoid the taxman. Nearly 30 cents per gallon goes to state and Federal taxes!

Food Costs – We spend an average of $49.48 on our holiday feast according to the American Farm Bureau, up 28 cents from last year. I don’t doubt their math, but I know at our house, we spend a lot more than that. The turkey alone runs $25, homemade mac and cheese another $5, homemade rolls are cheap at about $1, cranberry sauce (love the canned version) is another $1, fresh green beans run $3, dressing ingredients are around $5, sweet potatoes and marshmallows for the sweet side dish are about $6 – bringing us up to $46 before I begin my desserts.
A good pumpkin pie costs at least $5 to make and my signature apple crumb pie (fave of my mom and me) costs closer to $8. Then there’s cool whip, pecan pie, and you’re up closer to $60! Depending on your state sales tax on food, you could pay anywhere from 0% up to 7.25% sales tax on your food costs.
Thanksgiving cooking costs
Image source: TXU.com
Utility Costs – This is one cost I never really considered, but over Thanksgiving, we consume lots of gas and electricity as well as turkey and leftovers. We crank up our ovens non-stop for the day, keep the TV running for the Macy’s parade and the ensuing bowl games, run all the lights, add lots of extra toilet flushes from visiting family and go through gallons of water to clean pots and pans. The estimated increase in electric costs alone for Thanksgiving are $25 million nationwide and that’s taxable to you. You’ll pay a minimum of 3% and typically much more on the costs of your utilities expended for the holiday!
Thanksgiving wine tax
Image source: IndyWeek.com
Alcohol Costs – With Thanksgiving comes football and with football comes beer. As well, many families like to enjoy wine with their holiday dinner. I usually tip some amaretto into my pecan and apple pies and an occasional nip of Baileys on ice keeps the cooking stress at bay… You’ll pay between 11 cents and up to $2.50 in tax per gallon of wine purchased, beer comes with taxes of between 8 cents up to $1.07 per gallon. Hard liquor (including the aperitifs I cook with) are taxed at much higher rates of up to $20 per gallon depending on where you live. These are known as sin taxes and were once employed to discourage drinking, but now to line the taxman’s pocket!
Reviewing all these costs (including all the taxes I’ll be paying) and thinking about how long it’s going to take me to cook for everyone has me reconsidering my Thanksgiving plans altogether. I’m tempted by the lure of a trip south of the border to somewhere like Costa Rica where I can be waited on hand and foot and the only turkey I have to worry about is the one I’m married to lying on the beach beside me. Hmm… No, I guess Thanksgiving is inevitable, as are the taxes we’ll pay to enjoy our feast and the tryptophan-induced post-turkey comas that will follow.
Thanksgiving coma



Security Tax Services LLC

North Sound                                       South Sound
2802 Wetmore Ave, Suite 212           33530 1st Way S, Suite 102
Everett, WA 98201                             Federal Way, WA 98003
425.339.2400                                     253.237.0751
fax 425.259.1099                               fax 253.237.0701

Retirement Contributions Limits Announced for 2013 -


The Internal Revenue Service announced cost of living adjustments affecting dollar limitations for pension plans and other retirement-related items for Tax Year 2013.

In general, many of the pension plan limitations will change for 2013 because the increase in the cost-of-living index met the statutory thresholds that trigger their adjustment. However, other limitations will remain unchanged because the increase in the index did not meet the statutory thresholds that trigger their adjustment. Here are the highlights:
  • The elective deferral (contribution) limit for employees who participate in 401(k), 403(b), most 457 plans, and the federal government's Thrift Savings Plan is increased from $17,000 to $17,500.

  • The catch-up contribution limit for employees aged 50 and over who participate in 401(k), 403(b), most 457 plans, and the federal government's Thrift Savings Plan remains unchanged at $5,500.

  • Contribution limits for SIMPLE retirement accounts increase from $11,500 to $12,000.

  • The deduction for taxpayers making contributions to a traditional IRA is phased out for singles and heads of household who are covered by a workplace retirement plan and have modified adjusted gross incomes (AGI) between $59,000 and $69,000, up from $58,000 and $68,000 in 2012. For married couples filing jointly, in which the spouse who makes the IRA contribution is covered by a workplace retirement plan, the income phase-out range is $95,000 to $115,000, up from $92,000 to $112,000. For an IRA contributor who is not covered by a workplace retirement plan and is married to someone who is covered, the deduction is phased out if the couple's income is between $178,000 and $188,000, up from $173,000 and $183,000.

  • The AGI phase-out range for taxpayers making contributions to a Roth IRA is $178,000 to $188,000 for married couples filing jointly, up from $173,000 to $183,000 in 2012. For singles and heads of household, the income phase-out range is $112,000 to $127,000, up from $110,000 to $125,000. For a married individual filing a separate return who is covered by a retirement plan at work, the phase-out range remains $0 to $10,000.

  • The AGI limit for the saver's credit (also known as the retirement savings contribution credit) for low- and moderate-income workers is $59,000 for married couples filing jointly, up from $57,500 in 2012; $44,250 for heads of household, up from $43,125; and $29,500 for married individuals filing separately and for singles, up from $28,750.
Questions? Give us a call. We're here to help.

Security Tax Services LLC

North Sound                                       South Sound
2802 Wetmore Ave, Suite 212           33530 1st Way S, Suite 102
Everett, WA 98201                             Federal Way, WA 98003
425.339.2400                                     253.237.0751
fax 425.259.1099                               fax 253.237.0701


Monday, November 19, 2012

Expanded Adoption Credit -


   For 2012 the maximum adoption credit per eligible child is $12,650, down from $13,360 in 2011. The credit is no longer refundable and must be used as a credit against tax liability. In general, the credit is based on the reasonable and necessary expenses related to a legal adoption, including adoption fees, court costs, attorney's fees, and travel expenses. Special needs adoptions are eligible for the full credit regardless of whether expenses are qualified.

In order to claim the credit however, your modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) must be less than $229,710. This credit is set to expire on December 31, 2012, but can be carried forward over the next five additional years until the credit is used up or the time limit expires. Moving forward, in 2013 domestic adoptions of special needs children are eligible for a tax credit of $6,000.

If you adopted a child this year, or are planning to adopt a domestic adoptions of special needs children in 2013, you may be eligible for this credit. Additionally, if you adopted a child in 2010 or 2011 and didn't claim the refundable credit, you may be able to file an amended return. Be sure to contact us if you need assistance. We are here to help.

Security Tax Services LLC

North Sound                                       South Sound
2802 Wetmore Ave, Suite 212           33530 1st Way S, Suite 102
Everett, WA 98201                             Federal Way, WA 98003
425.339.2400                                     253.237.0751
fax 425.259.1099                               fax 253.237.0701