Thursday, February 28, 2013

Ignoring The IRS Doesn't Work. Open Your Mail! -


A client contacted me this week with a tax problem. He sent over a big pile of correspondence that he had received from the IRS. On the front of one of the letters, it read in big letters:
Last Date to Respond to this Letter: XXXX 2012.
Um, it’s 2013.
The client missed the deadline. It’s a common mistake, one that I deal with on a pretty regular basis. And 9 times out of 10, the reason is quite simple: the taxpayer didn’t open the mail.
I get it. It’s scary to get something from IRS. So the whole “I’ll just ignore it” mentality kicks in for taxpayers. They let the letters pile up. They refuse to go to the post office to pick up the certified letter. Sometimes, they even leave the letters on the stoop (for my friends in the South, that’s your top step). At my office, it’s not unusual for clients to drop piles of unopened mail from IRS on my desk during an appointment – yes, I’ve even had clients bring in Samsonite luggage full of Certified Mail, completely sealed.
But here’s the thing. While I understand why it happens (usually fear, paranoia, panic and even depression), letting that mail sit is the single worst thing you can do when it comes to tax matters. This is a case of what you don’t know, could actually hurt you.
When you get a letter from IRS, take a deep breath and open the envelope. It’s rarely as bad as you think. Sometimes it’s an informational letter (advising you, for example, that you might need to file a certain form), sometimes it’s simply a notice of adjustment and occasionally, you’ll receive a notice of deficiency. What’s most important to remember is that IRS correspondence is generally time sensitive – there are deadlines. And IRS deadlines are a big deal. Those deadlines affect your appeal rights and collections activities.
Depending on what the notice says, you may need to take action. Maybe you need to confirm a Social Security number or send a copy of a canceled check or other receipt. Maybe you owe some more money – or maybe the IRS owes you money (it happens). Maybe you need to write a letter or make a phone call. And this is the important part: contact the IRS when you have a problem. Or if there’s a notice. Again, ignoring the problem doesn't make it go away and usually makes it worse.
I’m going to let you in on a little secret: the IRS is staffed with real people. They have friends and families and lives, too. Believe it or not, their job isn’t to make your life miserable. Most of the time (and yes, I’m admitting this out loud), they really do want to help. But as cliche as it sounds, they can’t help you if you don’t contact them.
Those liens and levies? Stories about seizures? Those don’t happen without some effort from the IRS to notify taxpayers. The IRS has a whole set of procedures. They can’t levy indiscriminately. They can’t seize your property without notifying you that there’s a problem.
And yes, there are exceptions. I make my living dealing with a lot of those exceptions. But many times, starting with opening and responding to the the mail would have changed the outcome of a lot of the horror stories you hear. Trust me.
To contact the IRS about your tax account, start with your notice or letter. Generally, there is an address on the top left hand corner and a contact name and/or phone number in the top right hand corner. That’s the best contact to use because the folks at that number will understand what’s going on with your account. But if you've lost the notice or you have another issue, try these contact points:
  • If you’re calling about your individual tax account, call toll free, 1-800-829-1040, Monday – Friday, 7:00 a.m. – 7:00 p.m. your local time (Alaska & Hawaii follow Pacific Time).
  • If you’re calling about your business tax account, call toll free, 1-800-829-4933, Monday – Friday, 7:00 a.m. – 7:00 p.m. your local time (Alaska & Hawaii follow Pacific Time).
  • If you’re calling and you have a hearing impairments, call toll free, 1-800-829-4059 (TDD), Monday – Friday, 7:00 a.m. – 7:00 p.m. your local time (Alaska & Hawaii follow Pacific Time).
  • If you live outside the United States, the IRS has full-time permanent staff in 4 U.S. embassies and consulates (Frankfurt, Germany; London, UK; Paris, France; and Beijing, China). These offices have tax forms and publications, can help you with account problems, and answer your questions about notices and bills. Check out the International Services page on the IRS web site for specific contact information in these countries. Otherwise, telephone (267.941.1000), Monday – Friday, 6:00 a.m. – 11:00 p.m. (EST).
  • You can also visit a IRS Taxpayer Assistance Center. To find the office nearest you, click here.
You have lots of options. So, what if you still can’t bring yourself to pick up the phone or send a letter? We are your tax professionals, and we are here to help! If you are confused, stressed, or worried give us a call first and we can step you through getting your IRS issues solved.

North Sound                                       South Sound
2802 Wetmore Ave, Suite 212           33530 1st Way S, Suite 102
Everett, WA 98201                             Federal Way, WA 98003
425.339.2400                                     253.237.0751
fax 425.259.1099                               fax 253.237.0701


How Will Washington State Be Impacted By Sequestration? -


Five days. That’s how long until the sequestration goes into effect. Sequestration, painted as one half of the worst thing ever, is a series of across the board federal cuts which are scheduled to occur if Congress doesn't act to cut spending. And Congress hasn't acted on spending since 2011 (when they voted not to act on it).
Are you scared yet?
It might not be as bad as you think. Before we get to the nitty gritty, the bits that Congress and the President are fighting over, remember this: no matter how loud both parties shout at each other, this is all a fake line in the sand. They could fix it tomorrow. The deadline wasn't dropped down from the heavens: it was plucked out by Congress. They could pass another law tomorrow and change it. And indeed, they might. They have already pushed off the debt ceiling a few times this year (if you’re keeping score, the new deadline is May 18).
But it makes for good politics now. Governors from both sides of the aisle tend to side with the White House, bracing for the cuts which will total $85 billion. Gov. Brian Sandoval (R-NV) said about the cuts, “ I've not given up hope, but we’re going to be prepared for whatever comes. There will be consequences for our state.” Gov. Martin O’Malley (D-MD) took a different tact, saying, quite bluntly, “It’s senseless and it doesn't need to happen.”
Cuts are expected to hit education hard, putting thousands of teacher and teacher aide jobs at risk. Defense-related jobs aren't exempt with cutbacks planned in military-heavy states like Texas and California. Also on the chopping block? Aid to Hurricane Sandy. If the cuts go through as planned, many states worry that they won’t be able to plug the holes.
While the GOP wonders “What’s the worse that can happen?” the White House claims to have an answer. The White House has released fifty separate reports, outlining the potential damage to each state if the sequestration is allowed to happen. Here is what The White House has to say about our home state (download as PDF):

WASHINGTON IMPACTS 
If sequestration were to take effect, some examples of the impacts on Washington this year alone are: 
Teachers and Schools: Washington will lose approximately $11,606,000 in funding for primary and secondary education, putting around 160 teacher and aide jobs at risk. In addition about 11,000 fewer students would be served and approximately 50 fewer schools would receive funding.
Education for Children with Disabilities: In addition, Washington will lose approximately $11,251,000 in funds for about 140 teachers, aides, and staff who help children with disabilities. 
Work-Study Jobs: Around 440 fewer low income students in Washington would receive aid to help them finance the costs of college and around 180 fewer students will get work-study jobs that help them pay for college. 
Head Start: Head Start and Early Head Start services would be eliminated for approximately 1,000 children in Washington, reducing access to critical early education.
Protections for Clean Air and Clean Water: Washington would lose about $3,301,000 in environmental funding to ensure clean water and air quality, as well as prevent pollution from pesticides and hazardous waste. In addition, Washington could lose another $924,000 in grants for fish and wildlife protection.
Military Readiness: In Washington, approximately 29,000 civilian Department of Defense employees would be furloughed, reducing gross pay by around $173.4 million in total.
Army: Base operation funding would be cut by about $124 million in Washington. 
Air Force: Funding for Air Force operations in Washington would be cut by about $3 million. 
Navy: Cancel aircraft depot maintenance at Whidbey Island, a demolition project in Bremerton. 
Law Enforcement and Public Safety Funds for Crime Prevention and Prosecution: Washington will lose about $271,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law enforcement, prosecution and courts, crime prevention and education, corrections and community corrections, drug treatment and enforcement, and crime victim and witness initiatives. 
Job Search Assistance to Help those in Washington find Employment and Training: Washington will lose about $661,000 in funding for job search assistance, referral, and placement, meaning around 24,510 fewer people will get the help and skills they need to find employment. 
Child Care: Up to 800 disadvantaged and vulnerable children could lose access to child care, which is also essential for working parents to hold down a job. 
Vaccines for Children: In Washington around 2,850 fewer children will receive vaccines for diseases such as measles, mumps, rubella, tetanus, whooping cough, influenza, and Hepatitis B due to reduced funding for vaccinations of about $195,000. 
Public Health: Washington will lose approximately $642,000 in funds to help upgrade its ability to respond to public health threats including infectious diseases, natural disasters, and biological, chemical, nuclear, and radiological events. In addition, Washington will lose about $1,740,000 in grants to help prevent and treat substance abuse, resulting in around 3800 fewer admissions to substance abuse programs. And the Washington State Department of Health will lose about $174,000 resulting in around 4,300 fewer HIV tests. 
STOP Violence Against Women Program: Washington could lose up to $143,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 500 fewer victims being served. 
Nutrition Assistance for Seniors: Washington would lose approximately $1,053,000 in funds that provide meals for seniors. 

For more information about the President’s plan to “fix” the sequestration, you can watch the full video of the President’s speech here:


You can check out the reports for other states here (each report downloads as a pdf):


North Sound                                       South Sound
2802 Wetmore Ave, Suite 212           33530 1st Way S, Suite 102
Everett, WA 98201                             Federal Way, WA 98003
425.339.2400                                     253.237.0751
fax 425.259.1099                               fax 253.237.0701



Tuesday, February 19, 2013

Snohomish County 2013 tax statements are in the mail -


The Snohomish County Assessor’s office is responsible for annually updating the assessed values for all locally assessed real and personal property in Snohomish County and calculating the levy rates for all taxing districts for property tax purposes.
The Jan. 1, 2012 revaluation assessment date (or July 31, 2012 for new construction) is set using sales that occurred before those dates and is used to determine the amount of taxes owing in 2013.
Snohomish County voters continued to show their support for the majority of taxing districts that requested approval of tax increases in 2012. Those increases will appear on 2013 property tax statements.
Voters approved 13 of 16 monetary property tax measures on the ballot in 2012:
  • 3 were approved for fire districts’ maintenance and operation levies; and
  • 10 were approved for various school districts levies.

The levy rates calculated for taxing districts generally increased as a result of lower assessed values unless they reached their levy rate limit. The typical levy rate in 2012 was $12.3720 per thousand dollars of assessed value. The 2013 typical levy rate increased to $12.9669.
The total taxable assessed value decreased from $76.6 billion in 2012 to $72.6 billion in 2013 for tax purposes.
According to Kirke Sievers, County Treasurer his office will begin mailing tax statements on Feb. 15 and most property owners should receive their statements by the following week.
Property tax payment information for 2013 is also available on-line at the Treasurer’s office website: http://www1.co.snohomish.wa.us/Departments/Treasurer/
The average percent change for assessed value for residential properties ranged from a decrease of 2.8 percent in the City of Mill Creek; to a decrease of 18.4 percent in the City of Gold Bar.
The average percent change for property tax for residential properties ranged from an increase of 2.2 percent in the City of Mill Creek; to a decrease of 10.3 percent in the City of Sultan.
Taxing districts whose levies reached their limit saw a reduction of collectible taxes from the previous year. There were 50 taxing district levies for 2013 taxes that were affected as a result of decreased assessed values. For more information on how property tax levies are calculated visit the Assessor’s website at: http://assessor.snoco.org/divisions/levy.aspx
There are several tax relief programs available that are administered by the Assessor’s office.
Information about the senior citizen and disabled persons exemption can be found on the back side of property tax statements or by visiting the Assessor’s office website at:http://assessor.snoco.org/

Article Originally Published By South Everett Beacon Feb 18, 2013


North Sound                                       South Sound
2802 Wetmore Ave, Suite 212           33530 1st Way S, Suite 102
Everett, WA 98201                             Federal Way, WA 98003
425.339.2400                                     253.237.0751
fax 425.259.1099                               fax 253.237.0701


Will the IRS pursue me if I do not file my tax return or pay my taxes?


Yes, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) will pursue you in either case, whether you have not filed your tax return for one or more years or if you have filed your tax returns but have not worked with the IRS to establish some form of payment plan or settlement offer for the tax you owe.
When you do not file your federal income tax return, the IRS will generally file one for you.  A return filed by the IRS on your behalf is known as a substitute return.  Your tax in a substitute return is estimated based on previous returns you have filed, as well as any other information the IRS has about you and your income.  Usually when the IRS files a substitute return for a taxpayer, the taxpayer will end up owing more money to the IRS than if the taxpayer had filed the return in the first place for several reasons:
More actual tax owed. When the IRS files a substitute return for you, they generally will not apply all of your allowed deductions.  For example, they may use the standard deduction on your return rather than your itemized deductions.  This means that you will owe more tax to the IRS.
Failure to File penalty. When you do not file your return, the IRS charges a penalty on your unpaid tax at the rate of 5% per month.  The IRS will continue to charge you 5% per month for up to 5 months, which means you will owe whatever amount of tax you owed originally plus another 25% of that amount.
Interest. The IRS also charges interest on your unpaid tax balance.  The interest rate the IRS charges is adjusted quarterly based on the current market interest rate.
When you owe money to the IRS, the IRS will begin to use various methods to notify you of the unpaid tax liability.  Initially, the IRS may give you the benefit of the doubt, taking the stance that it is possible you do not realize you owe tax to them.  But as time passes, if you do not work with the IRS to address the tax liability, they will escalate their approach.  Ultimately, they will obtain a tax levy against your personal property.  The tax levy allows the IRS to garnish your wages, seize your bank accounts, and take your car and home if necessary.
From the time the tax is assessed, the IRS has 10 years to collect it.  Given the power the IRS has through a tax levy to seize your personal property and the 10-year statute of limitation on collecting federal income tax, the IRS will generally pursue you until they collect the money they are owed.

What should I do if I cannot afford to pay my taxes?

You should generally start by filing all of your tax returns if you have not done so already.  Filing your returns will minimize the addition of the various penalties and interest applied by the IRS and allow you to begin to work out some arrangement with the IRS.  You should also contact a tax professional.
A tax professional will be able to evaluate your unique situation, explain to you how the tax laws and process work in your case, and help you take the steps necessary to address your tax liability.  This can include a payment plan or an offer in compromise.
We are more than willing to help! Give us a call today to set up your free initial hour long consultation. Get your information in the hands of one of our Enrolled Agents so you can start getting the help you need today with your tax issues.

North Sound                                       South Sound
2802 Wetmore Ave, Suite 212           33530 1st Way S, Suite 102
Everett, WA 98201                             Federal Way, WA 98003
425.339.2400                                     253.237.0751
fax 425.259.1099                               fax 253.237.0701


Friday, February 15, 2013

The Cost Of Health Care Insurance, Taxes and Your W-2 -


Notice any different about your form W-2?
Take a look at Box 12. See anything that wasn’t there last year?

The value of health care coverage provided by your employer is now reported in Box 12 with Code DD to identify the amount. The amount reported in the box should include both the portion paid by your employer and any amount paid in by you.
So why is this information showing up on your form W-2 now? Under the Affordable Care Act – you may also refer to it as Obamacare or the health care act – most employers must now report the cost of your health care plan (a few small businesses are still exempt from reporting under the transitional relief offered by IRS).
Chances are that number is more than you thought. A lot more.
The average cost of healthcare for a typical American family of four in an employer-sponsored health plan in 2012 was $20,728. On average, employers paid $12,144 of that total cost while employees paid the rest. Employer contributions for health care plans for the typical American family are now nearly equivalent to the salary of a full time employment for a worker who is paid minimum wage.
And it’s not taxable.
That’s why most Americans don’t even know how much their health care coverage costs. It’s one of those benefits that many of us take for granted because we don’t see it on a tax or wage form.
But now that’s changing. The reporting requirement under the new law will make many more taxpayers aware of the actual cost of their health care benefits.
What’s not changing is the tax treatment of those benefits. It remains federal income tax free to you as an employee. So if you see wages of, say, $50,000 in Box 1 and benefits marked “DD” for health care insurance paid in $15,000 in Box 12, your income for purposes of calculating your federal income tax liability remains $50,000.
The requirement that the benefits are reported on your form W-2 is “for informational purposes only.” The purpose of the rule, according to the IRS, is to “provide employees useful and comparable consumer information on the cost of their health care coverage.” And believe it or not, that specific requirement wasn’t a partisan move: it was actually proposed by a bipartisan quartet made up of Sen. Max Baucus (D-MT); Michael B. Enzi (R-WY); Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-IA); and Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR).
But let’s be honest: is it really just for informational purposes? The IRS and Congress both say yes – for now. But a number of taxpayers fear that it’s not. That fear isn't totally unfounded. The tax free treatment of health care insurance benefits is a whopping $180 billion tax break to employees. And while for now raising the notion of taxing health care coverage – especially now that it’s mandated – would be political suicide, that doesn't mean that won’t change. You know that somewhere, some Senator has circled that number – $180 billion – in red ink.

North Sound                                       South Sound
2802 Wetmore Ave, Suite 212           33530 1st Way S, Suite 102
Everett, WA 98201                             Federal Way, WA 98003
425.339.2400                                     253.237.0751
fax 425.259.1099                               fax 253.237.0701



IRS Overwhelmed With Refund Requests, Asks Taxpayers To Slow Down -


Hold the phone (app), folks.
The IRS has announced that extremely high traffic is causing the “Where’s My Refund?” tool to be unavailable for some taxpayers at times this season. This affects both the “Where’s My Refund?” tool on IRS.gov and the refund feature on the IRS2go phone app.
Of course, this likely doesn't come as a surprise to most tax professionals: complaints about the system being down have been steady since tax season kicked off on January 30.
To help mitigate the problem, the IRS is asking taxpayers to only check on their refunds once a day. This actually makes a lot of sense since IRS systems are only updated once a day (usually overnight). Checking multiple times during the day won’t give you a different answer – and it’s just clogging up the system. And there’s no need to shop around: you’ll get the same answer on the internet as on the phone (this, according to the IRS though taxpayers are telling me different).
The IRS also advises that, to avoid technical woes, the best time to check on refunds is evening and weekends.
The timing on the announcement makes sense. Filing season opened on January 30 and most refunds for taxpayers who file electronically and use direct deposit are issued within 21 days. We are at day 15 and taxpayers are growing anxious. I suspect that systems are likely overwhelmed from the floodgates which were opened on January 30. Tax prepares encouraged taxpayers to file early even though the IRS was not accepting returns until the 30th: the result was that many returns were queued in advance, making January 30 an unusually busy day.
Volume is expected to increase as tax season goes forward so brace yourself. It looks like it’s going to be a bumpy ride.

North Sound                                       South Sound
2802 Wetmore Ave, Suite 212           33530 1st Way S, Suite 102
Everett, WA 98201                             Federal Way, WA 98003
425.339.2400                                     253.237.0751
fax 425.259.1099                               fax 253.237.0701



Friday, February 8, 2013

Guess What Turned 100 Last Weekend? -



English: 16th Amendment of the United States C...
English: 16th Amendment of the United States Constitution. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
   What do you get for the Tax Code that literally has everything?
That’s right, this week marks the official birthday of our modern day tax system. On February 3, 1913, Delaware became the 36th state to ratify the 16th Amendment, ushering in a new federal income tax. Alabama was the first, followed by a slew of mostly southern states including Kentucky, South Carolina, Mississippi, Oklahoma, Maryland, Georgia and Texas. Midwestern states Illinois and Ohio rounded out the top ten.
Taxation was nothing new to the U.S. by the time the new tax system took place. Skittish of taxes under the royal rule, the Founding Fathers nonetheless granted the right to the federal government to impose taxes under the Constitution. The right went largely ignored as it applied to individuals and taxes were more or less restricted to tariffs.
But a shot fired upon Fort Sumter in 1861 changed all that. With the advent of the Civil War, the federal government found itself in a need for cash. As we know, wars are expensive. And so, the first federal income tax was adopted as part of the Revenue Act of 1861. The tax was a flat 3% on annual income of more than $800 (just under $20,000 in today’s dollars). The next year, the flat tax was replaced by a graduated tax beginning at 3% for income of more than $600 (just over $13,000 in today’s dollars) and climbing to 5% for incomes over $10,000 (nearly a quarter of a million dollars in today’s dollars). Revenues from the tax allowed the Union to keep its troops fed and well-supplied; by the time the Confederacy fine-tuned its own system of taxation in 1864, it was too late to contribute much to the war effort. The war ended in 1865 and the tax, which had continued to climb as the war raged on, brought in nearly $310 million to the Treasury (nearly $5 billion in today’s dollars).
Post-Civil War, however, the nation was tired and large segments of the population – especially in the South – were impoverished. Congress allowed the income tax to expire and focused, instead, on tariffs on products like tobacco and liquor.
However, as the nation struggled to recover from the Civil War – and looked likely to be pulled into another war – the United States experienced the worst economic depression of its short history. Accelerated by an over-exuberant market and bank failures (sound familiar?), the Panic of 1893 forced Congress’ hand once again: income taxes were re-instituted in 1894. A year later, the U.S. Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Melville Fuller, declared on a narrow vote of 5-4 that law to be unconstitutional. The case that led to the ruling, Pollock v. Farmers’ Loan and Trust Company (157 U.S. 429 (1895), aff’d on reh’g, 158 U.S. 601 (1895), focused on a Massachusetts man, Charles Pollock, who sued Farmers’ Loan & Trust Company to prevent it from paying the tax on his stock shares. The Supreme Court ruled in the case that income taxes on interest, dividends and rents were direct taxes and were, therefore, unconstitutional because they violated the Constitutional provision that direct taxes be apportioned. That was a first for Congress: in the four cases regarding income tax brought before the Court, not one had ever struck down a law as unconstitutional.
It was back to the drawing board for Congress.
Interestingly, income derived from wages and salaries were not included in the ruling. Those had already been declared constitutional; rather, it was the specific case of income taxes on property (in this case, interest, dividends and rents) that caught the Court’s attention. Taxes derived from property were considered to be direct taxes while indirect taxes were those on labor and services. The only way to “fix” the disparity was to have Congress amend the Constitution to be able to tax income from any source without apportionment.
And that’s exactly what the 16th Amendment did. The Amendment reads:
The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several states, and without regard to any census or enumeration.
An uneasy Congress, under President William H. Taft, passed the new income tax law in 1909. It would take four years to get the necessary number of states to ratify the amendment. Eventually, forty-two of the forty-eight states would ratify the amendment (Alaska and Hawaii didn't exist, Florida and Pennsylvania refused to consider it and Connecticut, Rhode Island, Utah and Virginia voted no). By law, a proposed amendment becomes part of the Constitution as soon as it is ratified by three-fourths of the States. At the time, 36 states were needed; 38 of 50 states would be needed to ratify the Constitution today.
It is the stuff of conspiracy theories. The lengthy process to ratify the Sixteenth Amendment gave rise to a number of suggestions that it was never actually ratified, making our federal income tax system a hoax. The matter has been discussed and feuded and yes, even litigated, a number of times. The Internal Revenue Service eventually issued Rev. Ruling 2005-19 deeming that argument to be a frivolous tax position; making this claim can subject taxpayers to a penalty of up to $25,000.
Today, taxpayers can thank (*ahem*) President Taft and the 61st Congress for making history. But the Sixteenth Amendment wasn't the only news item in 1913. That year also saw the first minimum wage law take effect in the US (Oregon); the first presidential press conference (President Woodrow Wilson, who succeeded President Taft); the U.S. Post office began making parcel post deliveries; and perhaps most important, the first prize in a Cracker Jack box.
You’re totally ready for your next cocktail party now.
Originally published on Forbes.com by Kelly Phillips Erb - 02/04/2013


North Sound                                       South Sound
2802 Wetmore Ave, Suite 212           33530 1st Way S, Suite 102
Everett, WA 98201                             Federal Way, WA 98003
425.339.2400                                     253.237.0751
fax 425.259.1099                               fax 253.237.0701