Friday, August 30, 2013

Treasury and IRS Announce That All Legal Same-Sex Marriages Will Be Recognized For Federal Tax Purposes -

The U.S. Department of the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) today ruled that same-sex couples, legally married in jurisdictions that recognize their marriages, will be treated as married for federal tax purposes. The ruling applies regardless of whether the couple lives in a jurisdiction that recognizes same-sex marriage or a jurisdiction that does not recognize same-sex marriage.

The ruling implements federal tax aspects of the June 26 Supreme Court decision invalidating a key provision of the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act.

Under the ruling, same-sex couples will be treated as married for all federal tax purposes, including income and gift and estate taxes. The ruling applies to all federal tax provisions where marriage is a factor, including filing status, claiming personal and dependency exemptions, taking the standard deduction, employee benefits, contributing to an IRA and claiming the earned income tax credit or child tax credit.

Any same-sex marriage legally entered into in one of the 50 states, the District of Columbia, a U.S. territory or a foreign country will be covered by the ruling. However, the ruling does not apply to registered domestic partnerships, civil unions or similar formal relationships recognized under state law.

Legally-married same-sex couples generally must file their 2013 federal income tax return using either the married filing jointly or married filing separately filing status.

Individuals who were in same-sex marriages may, but are not required to, file original or amended returns choosing to be treated as married for federal tax purposes for one or more prior tax years still open under the statute of limitations.

Generally, the statute of limitations for filing a refund claim is three years from the date the return was filed or two years from the date the tax was paid, whichever is later. As a result, refund claims can still be filed for tax years 2010, 2011 and 2012. Some taxpayers may have special circumstances, such as signing an agreement with the IRS to keep the statute of limitations open, that permit them to file refund claims for tax years 2009 and earlier.

Additionally, employees who purchased same-sex spouse health insurance coverage from their employers on an after-tax basis may treat the amounts paid for that coverage as pre-tax and excludable from income.


How to File a Claim for Refund
Taxpayers who wish to file a refund claim for income taxes should use Form1040X, Amended U.S. Individual Income Tax Return.

Taxpayers who wish to file a refund claim for gift or estate taxes should file Form 843, Claim for Refund and Request for Abatement. For information on filing an amended return, see Tax Topic 308, Amended Returns, available on IRS.gov, or the Instructions to Forms 1040X and 843. Information on where to file your amended returns is available in the instructions to the form.

Future Guidance
Treasury and the IRS intend to issue streamlined procedures for employers who wish to file refund claims for payroll taxes paid on previously-taxed health insurance and fringe benefits provided to same-sex spouses. Treasury and IRS also intend to issue further guidance on cafeteria plans and on how qualified retirement plans and other tax-favored arrangements should treat same-sex spouses for periods before the effective date of this Revenue Ruling.

Other agencies may provide guidance on other federal programs that they administer that are affected by the Code. 

Revenue Ruling 2013-17, along with updated Frequently Asked Questions for same-sex couples and updated FAQs for registered domestic partners and individuals in civil unions, are available today on IRS.gov. See also Publication 555, Community Property.


Treasury and the IRS will begin applying the terms of Revenue Ruling 2013-17 on Sept. 16, 2013, but taxpayers who wish to rely on the terms of the Revenue Ruling for earlier periods may choose to do so, as long as the statute of limitations for the earlier period has not expired.

If you or someone you know needs help filing give us a call today!


North Sound                                       South Sound
2802 Wetmore Ave, Suite 212           33530 1st Way S, Suite 102
Everett, WA 98201                             Federal Way, WA 98003
425.339.2400                                     253.237.0751
fax 425.259.1099                               fax 253.237.0701

Thursday, August 29, 2013

Taxing Social Security Benefits Q&A -

Taxpayer asks:
If you have turned full retirement age and are receiving your retirement and also still working full time, how does this effect your taxes?
-----
This is a pretty common scenario these days – and a popular question!
Once you reach retirement age, whether your Social Security payments are taxable depends on your filing status and how much other income you receive. Check your federal form SSA-1099 for the total of your benefits. Once you have that number, here are a few key points:
If your only source of income is Social Security benefits, your benefits are generally not taxable.
If you received income from other sources, your benefits will not be taxed unless your modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) is more than the base amount for your filing status. Whether that income is taxable is based on a formula. The quick and dirty version of the formula is to add one-half of the total Social Security benefits you received (that’s what is reported on the form SSA-1099) to all your other income, including any tax exempt interest and other exclusions from income. Then, compare this total to the base amount for your filing status:
The base amounts (which are never adjusted for inflation) are:
  • $32,000 for taxpayers who file as married filing jointly;
  • $25,000 for taxpayers who file as single, head of household, qualifying widow/widower with a dependent child, or married filing separately who did not live with their spouses at any time during the year; and
  • $0 for married persons filing separately who lived together during the year.
If the total is more than your base amount, some of your benefits may be taxable.
Check out our SSA Taxable Income Calculator for a quick and easy way to find out how much of your benefits may be taxable!
And as always, if you need help or have questions we are here year round! Give us a call today!

North Sound                                       South Sound
2802 Wetmore Ave, Suite 212           33530 1st Way S, Suite 102
Everett, WA 98201                             Federal Way, WA 98003
425.339.2400                                     253.237.0751
fax 425.259.1099                               fax 253.237.0701

Monday, August 26, 2013

Michael Jackson's Estate To IRS: Beat It -

It’s possible that the legacy of Michael Jackson could turn out to be a string of court cases. He has kept lawyers and business managers happily employed since he died – and his tax lawyers are no exception. The estate for the King of Pop is planning to go to the mattress in the fight against the Internal Revenue Service over taxes and penalties assessed as a result of values reported on his federal estate tax return.
Michael Jackson died on June 25, 2009, in Los Angeles, California. The federal estate tax exemption amount was $3,500,000 for decedents dying in 2009. That means that estate assets in excess of that amount are taxed.
For federal purposes, estate tax is calculated on the net value of the assets in the control of the decedent as of the date of death. There is an election available to use the values as of six months after the date of death, as well. That election is referred to as AVD, or alternate valuation date, and is intended to account for the potential drop in the value of a decedent’s estate due to fluctuations in the market or a drop in the value of the businesses owned by the decedent. That drop can happen to ordinary taxpayers like you and me but it’s not the case for Michael Jackson who remains firmly near the top of Forbes’ list of Top Earning Dead Celebrities.
Taxes payable as a result of the death of the decedent are the responsibility of the estate. Even though Jackson’s will requires most of the taxes due to be paid out of his trust, the executors of the estate are legally responsible for filing and arranging for the payment of taxes. That’s why, as a practical matter, the estate is suing the IRS. The case has been captioned (after an August 14, 2013 amendment) Estate of Michael J. Jackson, Deceased, John G. Branca, Co-Executor and John McClain, Co-Executor, Petitioner(s) v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent (017152-13 U.S. Tax Court) and was filed in U.S. Tax Court.
So why all the fighting? Jackson’s estate was said to have been valued between $80 million and $500 million. That’s, er, a lot of disparity. And that’s exactly the problem.
The estate has valued the assets at lower amounts than the IRS believes to be appropriate. A number of assets are said to be at issue including Neverland Ranch, automobiles and amounts attributable to the singer’s image, likeness and intellectual property.
Remember what I said earlier about the tax being imposed on the value as of the date of death? That would seem to mean that future dollars aren't taxable, right? Well, not exactly. For purposes of the federal estate tax, the ability to receive future payments is a valuable right. For tax purposes, the value is the projected future worth discounted to the present day – or in simple terms, what a third party would pay today for the right to receive those payments in the future. In most cases, this calculation is figured on average annual earnings over a period of time (often five years).
This is easy when earnings are somewhat stable, as in the case of Elvis, who continued to earn a steady stream of income even when he wasn't performing.
But it’s more difficult when a star’s earnings rise and fall, as in the case of Michael Jackson. Just before his death, Jackson was thought to be spending more than he was making. According to the New York Times, in the early 2000s, Jackson blew through literally hundreds of millions of dollars of loans and lines of credit – those loans were guaranteed by assets owned by Jackson. In that same time period, he only produced one studio album, the ironically titled Invincible, which would go on to sell only half of his 1995 effort, HIStory: Past, Present and Future, Book I, and only a fraction of his mega-block buster album, Thriller. Jackson was hit by scandal after scandal at the time – and even as he was planning his controversial comeback tour – it was clear that he wasn't the entertainer he used to be. His death, accelerated by drug use including propofol and benzodiazepines, and allegations about his health and lifestyle only add to the suggestion that the singer’s stage presence would likely not have been as remarkable as it once was. How do you place a value on his projected earnings when it’s hard to understand how the public might react to him?
The estate used an appraiser, of course. A qualified appraiser would take into consideration of those factors: reputation, star power and encumbrances on his earning potential. I’m guessing that the appraisal came back on the low side, based on an argument for date of death values. The estate is likely going to argue that the singer’s future earning power was actually depressed and the subsequent boon to the estate, while nice, could not have been predicted as of the date of death.
Looking at how well the estate is doing now, however, the IRS likely takes a much different position. The estate has been pulling in considerable dollars: $170 million in 2011 and $145 million in 2012. The singer has earned more than any single living artist since his death. In fact, his estate made so much money after his death that it was anticipated that the singer’s debts would be paid in full at the end of 2012.
How the public viewed Jackson likely also affects the valuation of his assets. Which valuation do you use, for example, for Neverland Ranch: the date of death value for the bizarre, neglected and poorly maintained site marred by scandal and allegations of child abuse? Or the singular home of the now practically canonized King of Pop?
It’s an interesting set of questions. The valuations associated with “ordinary people” are much easier to assess because they are generally black and white. It boils down to a question of willing buyer and willing seller. But, with celebrities, it’s a more difficult issue because so much of the value of an item is tied to how we view the celebrity. And over time, we forget about the bad stuff, including the scandals, the violence and the addictions. Sometimes, at death, the drunk becomes the artistic genius; the control freak becomes the industry icon and the thug was, we learned, really just misunderstood. The same is true for Jackson: now, it’s not so creepy to be the teenage boy waxing on about Michael Jackson a la Justin Bieber.
Resolving this case won’t be as simple as pulling up a Kelley Blue Book value or finding a historic stock price. Valuation is subjective. And it’s clear that the IRS and the estate don’t see eye to eye on a number of issues. At stake is not just taxes and a few thousand dollars of interest: if the estate is found to have misrepresented the value of items on the return, penalties could run as high as 40%.

As is the rule with individual tax matters, the IRS has not issued a comment. Jackson’s legal team stands firmly behind their court filings.
As for Jackson, with cases still pending in civil court and now this one in U.S. Tax Court, the star who was notoriously private during his lifetime has become one of the most talked about celebrities after his death.


North Sound                                       South Sound
2802 Wetmore Ave, Suite 212           33530 1st Way S, Suite 102
Everett, WA 98201                             Federal Way, WA 98003
425.339.2400                                     253.237.0751
fax 425.259.1099                               fax 253.237.0701

Thursday, August 22, 2013

2290s Due Soon -

The Internal Revenue Service today reminded truckers and other owners of heavy highway vehicles that in most cases, their next federal highway use tax return is due on Tuesday, Sept. 3, 2013.

This year’s Sept. 3 due date, pushed back three days because the normal Aug. 31 deadline falls on a Saturday, generally applies to Form 2290 and the accompanying tax payment for the tax year that begins on July 1, 2013, and ends on June 30, 2014. Returns must be filed and tax payments made by Sept. 3 for vehicles first used on the road during July. For vehicles first used after July, the deadline is the last day of the month following the month of first use.

Though some taxpayers have the option of filing Form 2290 on paper, the IRS encourages all taxpayers to take advantage of the speed and convenience of filing this form electronically and paying any tax due electronically. Taxpayers reporting 25 or more vehicles must e-file. A list of IRS-approved software providers can be found on IRS.gov.

Due to facility maintenance taking place over the Labor Day weekend, the IRS will be unable to accept or acknowledge receipt of any electronically-filed returns from 10 p.m. Eastern Time on Saturday, Aug. 31, to 5:30 a.m. ET on Tuesday, Sept. 3. The IRS asks taxpayers to e-file Form 2290 before 10 p.m. ET on Aug. 31. Paper returns must be mailed and postmarked by midnight on Sept. 3. IRS offices will be closed on Labor Day, Monday, Sept. 2.

The highway use tax applies to highway motor vehicles with a taxable gross weight of 55,000 pounds or more. This generally includes trucks, truck tractors and buses. Ordinarily, vans, pick-ups and panel trucks are not taxable because they fall below the 55,000-pound threshold. The tax of up to $550 per vehicle is based on weight, and a variety of special rules apply, explained in the instructions to Form 2290.

More information on the impact of the facility maintenance and the federal highway use tax is available at IRS.gov/truckers.    

Confused? As always, we are here to help! We speak tax, so you don't have to!



North Sound                                       South Sound
2802 Wetmore Ave, Suite 212           33530 1st Way S, Suite 102
Everett, WA 98201                             Federal Way, WA 98003
425.339.2400                                     253.237.0751
fax 425.259.1099                               fax 253.237.0701



Tuesday, August 13, 2013

TaxGirl Explains 13 Understatements, Half-Truths & Misunderstandings About Motherhood

Here at Security Tax Services we are big fans of the Tax Girl aka Kelly Phillips Erb, and wanting to share one of her latest blogs with our readers;

The interview was going fairly well. I was feeling confident, even in my borrowed suit, having fielded a number of questions about law school and my internship in the estates department at the Internal Revenue Service. I even passed an impromptu pop quiz about the Tax Code with flying colors, all while keeping my nerves at bay. My first “real” job in the legal world was a big deal to me and I didn’t want to blow it. I was prepared for almost anything. Until this question: “So are you planning on having any kids?”
I blinked. I stammered a little bit. And then I answered truthfully, saying that as one of three children, I always assumed that I would have kids of my own. I quickly added that I remained committed to being a lawyer, that I didn’t have a set time frame for having children and that I knew that, when the time came, I would be able to manage the demands of the legal practice with motherhood. I felt pretty good about my answer.
But it wasn’t long before I was asked the same question again.
It turns out that while it’s inappropriate – and perhaps unwise – to ask questions about plans for having children, it’s not illegal (though making a hiring decision based on that question is illegal). And it happens. A lot more than you’d think.
You see, the decision to have a child has always been painted as a private one. But realistically, it’s always been more than that. Whether and when to have children is easily a talking point for our friends, our own parents, our neighbors – and even potential employers. We whisper about it in coffee shops and discuss it on talk shows. We gobble up celebrity parenting stories online and watch entire television shows about the likes of Kate Gosselin and Honey Boo-Boo.
But if discussions about whether to have a child were actually private, we wouldn’t have had that cover story on Time magazine touting “The Childfree Life.” Or this story in the Guardian about smart women not having kids. Or a day like last Thursday, when both CBS and NBC led their morning coverage with stories about mothering and careers.
The reality is that we like talking about it. But I’m not sure that we’re talking about it in the right way. We like sound bites and pithy anecdotes and snippets of statistics but those things tell just half a story.
Last week, I surveyed a number of women about their perceptions and thoughts on motherhood. The number of answers that I received blew me away: it was the largest response I’ve ever had for a story. Women really do want to talk about this issue. And they want to talk about it honestly. As I sorted through the hundreds of emails and messages, I started thinking about much of what’s been missing from our dialogue on motherhood. With that in mind, here are thirteen understatements, half-truths & misunderstandings – some serious and some light-hearted – that our society has about motherhood:
1. You get maternity leave. Folks talk about maternity leave as if it’s a paid vacation. Let’s just get something out of the way from the get go: your employer may be required to grant you time off under the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) but it’s unpaid leave. And not all employees qualify: you only qualify if your employer is a public agency (think government employees) or a private employer with 50 or more employees. Some employers may also offer short-term disability insurance which covers pregnancy: if that’s the case, you may be able to get partial pay for approximately six weeks after you have a baby. That money will come in handy because, well, see #2.
2. Raising kids is expensive. Of course it is. But we don’t talk about how expensive. For a typical middle-income family in America, the U.S. Department of Agriculture estimates (downloads as a pdf) that it will cost nearly $300,000, adjusted for inflation, to raise a child from birth to age 17, or more nearly $20,000 per child – that doesn’t include the cost of private education or the cost of college. Housing is the single most expensive cost attributable to raising a child, accounting for 30% of the total. For kicks, I entered my information into the USDA calculator (you can give it a whirl here) to find out more based on my children’s ages, our income bracket and our geographic area. The USDA kindly advised that, taking into account all expenses including health care, food, clothing, housing and transportation, I would likely spend $54,647 on costs associated with my three children each year. I’m beginning to think they need to do more around the house.
3. Your entertainment choices are limited. I’m not going to lie to you: there’s some really bad kid TV out there. And even though you tell yourself that as an educated, grown person, you will not subject yourself to bad children’s TV, you will. There’s practically no parent out there who hasn’t both seen – and complained incessantly about – Caillou. And now, all of those same parents have that theme song stuck in their head (sorry!). It happens. But it’s not all bad: you have a good excuse to see all of the good Pixar movies in the theatre and even wear the kooky 3D glasses if you want. And yes, there’s “real” culture, too. We’ve seen the Nutcracker at the ballet and Wicked on stage – as well as the London edition of Les Miserable on DVD more than anyone should have to, really, but who could say no to Nick Jonas in 18th century French costuming?
4. You get the benefit of a tax deduction. Admit it. Those little onesies that proclaim “Mother’s Little Tax Deduction” are adorable – if slightly flawed. You see, if your child is a “qualifying child” for tax purposes (and in most traditional family situations, that would be the case), you would be entitled to claim an exemption amount for a dependent. It’s not exactly the same thing as a deduction – and you don’t have to itemize in order to claim it. It is, in simple terms, the amount that you can exclude from taxable income; the exemption is $3,900 for 2013. That sounds pretty great, right? That means that I can reduce my taxable income by $11,700 in 2013 simply for having children. But see #2. Those kids are simultaneously reducing my real income by much more.
5. You don’t sleep. You do sleep. Statistically, you actually sleep a little more in the beginning of motherhood than the average person. A 2005 Sleep in America poll found that, on average, adults in America report sleeping an average of 6.9 hours per night when considering both weekday and weekend sleep. New moms get a bit longer average sleep: 7.2 hours. But here’s the rub: it’s “highly fragmented” sleep which can be likened to the same kinds of disturbed sleep as you experience with, say, sleep apnea. Your sleep gets regularly disrupted throughout the night, meaning that there is little in the way of quality of sleep. That can make you cranky and contribute to lack of concentration – and other fatigue-related problems which could affect your daily activities, like, oh, say, your job performance. So see #6.
6. Having a child reduces your chances of getting a promotion and moving up the career ladder. In the 2009-2010 class, women made up 47.2% of J.D. students. About that same rough percentage – 45.4% of associates – were women in 2011. However, only 23% of all federal judgeships were held by women. At top law firms for women, 10% of firm chairpersons were women, 12% of the firms had women managing partners and 19% of the equity partners were women. I cite those statistics because I’m a lawyer and that’s the world that I know. I also happen to know that while some of those numbers are attributable to motherhood (you try being coherent for 80 hours a week at the office and still remembering all of the words and moves to ‘Head and Shoulders, Knees and Toes’), it’s not a matter of simply connecting the dots. There are clearly other factors at play, including your run of the mill gender discrimination and the curious notion of why anyone would want to remain in the law.
Of the women I surveyed, about half of those who had children predicted that they would have been in the same place, career-wise, without children; about the same percentage of those who didn’t have children estimated that they would be in the same place if they did have children. The answer to the question, however, appeared to vary more by career choice than motherhood. Penney Mizell Brooks, who works as a Human Resource Policy Training Specialist, indicated that she “would have made different, more drastic, more risky career choices if not for being a parent.” Many chimed in similarly, saying that they might have gone back to school or tried for management positions.
Others, however, aren’t so sure that motherhood played a role in their current position, saying that their career path is exactly as they assumed it would be. Still others believe that women may use motherhood as a crutch, with a successful freelancer telling the story of a competitor who volunteered that “she would be as successful as me if she didn’t have children, but I think that’s just an excuse.”
7. It’s easy to work outside of the home since you can put your kids in child care. It is true that a lot of parents opt to pay for child care. In order to accommodate work schedules for parents, nearly 11 million children under age 5 are in some type of child care setting for an average of 35 hours each week; by the numbers, that works out to just under the population of the state of Ohio. In 40 states and the District of Columbia,the cost of child care for an infant exceeds 10% of state median income for a married couple. Depending on where you live, that actual out of pocket attributable to putting your infant in child care ranges from $4,600 to $15,000 per year. Compare those numbers to the salary for a person making minimum wage in 2013: he or she would earn just $14,500 annually, pre-tax.
To offset the cost of child care, taxpayers may qualify for the child and dependent care credit. To qualify, you must pay qualified costs for qualifying children under age 13, or for dependents of any age who live with you for more than half of the year and who physically or mentally cannot take care of themselves. The credit can be up to 35% of your qualifying expenses, depending upon your adjusted gross income (AGI): as you make more money, the credit decreases. For 2013, you may use up to $3,000 of expenses paid in a year for one qualifying individual or $6,000 for two or more qualifying individuals to figure the credit; largely, child care expenses exceed those caps. If you do the math, it means that those at the bottom struggle simply to pay for child care and those at the top are dinged for paying.
So does that mean that the cost of child care is driving women out the workplace? Clearly not, if you consider the number of children still in child care. That said, almost all of the moms I surveyed who did quit work after they had children cited the cost and worries over quality child care as a primary reason. That typically happened not after the first child, when child care was still manageable, but after the second or third, when the costs and in some cases, hassles, of paying for child care made it unrealistic to continue.
8. Your diet will necessarily turn into the stuff of school cafeteria nightmares. Yes, things change. But let’s be clear on this one: my life is not a rotating smorgasbord of chicken nuggets and Happy Meals. I like to cook. I like to eat out. I always have. And having kids didn’t change that. While it’s true that we now have industrial sized boxes of Pepperidge Farm Goldfish in our home, as well as enough juice boxes to carry a small town through a nuclear disaster, we’ve made a conscious decision to introduce our kids to all kinds of food. My kids eat dim sum and sauerkraut and naan and every kind of vegetable on the planet. In fact, they’ll try almost anything: over the weekend, they even tried bone marrow at nearby Wyebrook Farms.
And while I realize the folly of dragging them into a quiet BYO (nobody wants to have a romantic dinner with my kids at the next table), that doesn’t mean that we’re relegated to terrible eateries. We go to real restaurants where I expect them to act like human beings – quite frankly, they’re often better behaved than many of the adults.
In our family, I think it’s important not to buy into the stereotype that kids are de facto picky eaters. I have a pantry filled with chutneys and chili peppers that says different.
9. Women must sacrifice their own education in order to have children. The Guardian article that garnered so much recent press focused on research that Satoshi Kanazawa performed indicating that “maternal urges drop by 25% with every extra 15 IQ points.” Kanazawa lamented that smart women were no longer having children, a notion that he claimed was antithetical with survival of our culture since fewer intelligent moms should mean fewer intelligent kids. If we keep that up, he posited, we’ll end up with a nation filled with dunderheads (I might have paraphrased him a bit there).
While there is some data to suggest that women with advanced degrees are less likely to have children, it’s mostly old data that’s a little bit skewed. According to a fairly recent Pew Study, a higher level of education is associated with lower rates of motherhood except for women who pursue the most advanced degrees. In other words, women with professional degrees and Ph.D.’s are actually more likely to have children than their counterparts with lesser degrees. In terms of tipping the bus, I’m firmly on the professional degree with children side.
What could cause these kinds of numbers? Claudia Goldin has suggested that certain of the fields that require the most education may also be those fields that allow a healthy work-family balance. Whatever the reasons, almost across the board, responses from the women I’ve surveyed seem to suggest that most women are still pursuing the level education they intended whether they have children or not.
10. You have to drive a mini-van. Before we had children, we had an awesome car. It was a little bit of death trap but it was beautiful: a 1976 Fiat Spyder convertible. We still have it though it’s mostly relegated to the garage for very practical reasons: it has lap belts only, no air bags and it doesn’t have a proper back seat. Nowadays, however, car seat laws and other state and federal safety regulations mean that you have to be somewhat practical. Safety matters. No, you don’t have to buy the mini-van, even though many of my friends swear by them, but the fun little two-seater is definitely out. At least for 15 or so years.
11. Paying for your child’s education will bankrupt you in your golden years. The College Board reports that the cost of an education at an in-state public college for the 2012–2013 academic year averaged $22,261; for a private college, the average cost was $43,289. Those are big, big numbers and they cause many sleepless nights for a lot of parents. But here’s a big secret: you don’t have to lose your shirt over your kid’s education. You don’t have to spring for the most expensive school; even if you do, financial aid in the form of grants and scholarships may be available. And some folks have suggested that it might be a good idea not to pay for your child’s education in the first place: there’s nothing that says you have to. I know it sounds terrible but, to be fair, my parents didn’t pay for me to go to college. I relied on scholarships, work and borrowing to finance my education and despite how terrible making your kids pay their own way may be painted in the press, it didn’t kill me. In fact, I’m still paying for my education now – and I consider it an investment.
But even if you do opt to pay your child’s way through college, you don’t have to break the bank. You can invest as you go through qualified tuition plans, such as 529 plans and Coverdell Education Savings Accounts. Additionally, when the time comes to write the check, there are education tax credits, including the American Opportunity Credit, and deductions, such as the above-the-line tuition and fees deduction and the student loan interest deduction, available to help offset those costs.
12. You won’t ever go anywhere interesting ever again. That picture of that couple lying on the beach on the cover of Time touting “The Childfree Life” has attracted quite a bit of attention. My vacation photos never look like that. Of course, they never really looked like that before I had kids either. But it was the case that vacations were easier before kids. I used to be the kind of girl who could be packed and ready in five minutes. Now, I can’t even get the kids with their pre-packed suitcases out of the door in five minutes. But that doesn’t mean that every vacation has to be a stop at an amusement park. While I’m not as bad as my dad – who used to drag us to cemetery to do grave-rubbings for his genealogy project (which, to be honest, we thought was pretty awesome) – I take my kids to places that I want to go within reason. So no, they didn’t go to Vegas with me and my husband and I didn’t take them to Cooperstown for our anniversary. But I have run a 5k with my daughter on Bald Head Island and taken a pedicab through New York City’s Time Square with my son. We’ve been to state parks and small town fairs. My kids have scrambled over rocks in Maine and gone digging for clams in the sounds of North Carolina. It’s more difficult to travel with kids. Airfare is crazy expensive. Hotels are meant for families of four. And day passes at amusement parks for all five can run roughly the cost of our mortgage. But we’ve made it work.
Interestingly, however, when I asked mothers to name one thing they wished they had done differently, it wasn’t careers or sleep or education that most cited. The number one regret? Not traveling enough before having children.
13. Everybody else is doing it. When I was a kid, it went without saying that I was going to be a mom. And my mom before that. And her mom before that. But that’s not true anymore. The birthrate in the U.S. at an all-time low: about 80% of women become mothers now, compared with 90% just forty years ago. While it’s true, then, that statistically more women are still opting in to motherhood, it’s no longer a given that being female equals having children. So even if you were inclined to keep up with the Joneses, it’s hard to know what that means any more.
I don’t think that there was ever a moment when I thought that I wasn’t going to have children. I just knew I that I was going to be a mom. I will confess, however, that every now and again, I imagine that it would be amazing to have those moments of quiet thoughtfulness. A day where no one asks me for a snack or follows me to the bathroom. A day where I don’t have to break up an argument about who gets to put the lightning bug in a jar or who gets the purple crayon first. A day where I could just plop down and click on the television to watch something completely indulgent. But that isn’t the life I chose.
And that’s the bit that I think is hard to reconcile in all of this press that we’ve been seeing popping up. Having children is a choice. And not having children is a choice. And just like any important choice, you should arm yourself with the facts. But then, it’s up to you.
Want more taxgirl goodness? Pick your poison: You can receive posts by email, follow me on twitter (@taxgirlhang out with me on Facebook andcheck out my YouTube channel. NEW at taxgirl: you can subscribe to the podcast on the site or via iTunes (it’s free).

Monday, August 5, 2013

How to Get Up Early and Be More Productive -

Apple CEO Tim Cook is known for sending company emails at 4:30 in the morning. Lexy Flunk, chief executive of Brooklyn Industries, is usually up by 4 a.m. And Virgin American CEO David Cush wakes up at 4:15 to send emails, read the paper and work out at the gym. They are just a few of the legions of CEOs and small-business owners who start their days early, seeking an advantage over competitors who sleep in.
If you’re not a “morning person” and still need convincing, time-management expert Laura Vanderkam offers several compelling reasons to tap into those early — and often most productive — hours of the day.
1. You have fewer distractions. Getting up early gives you an opportunity to focus on the day’s to-do list before the inevitable interruptions begin.
2. You have more willpower. People generally have the most willpower in the early hours. As the day goes by and you grapple with pressing issues and difficult people, your resolve can be depleted. “Willpower is like a muscle [that] becomes fatigued with overuse,” Vanderkam tells Entrepreneur.
3. You can start the day on a positive note. Completing a few tasks early — as opposed to oversleeping and then rushing around to get everything done — helps set an upbeat tone for the whole day.
How to Be a Better “Morning Person”
If being an early riser doesn’t come easily, here are some tips to help you get up and going.
Before Bedtime
Say no to caffeine and alcohol. Caffeine affects people differently, but it’s widely known that its intake disrupts sleep patterns and can linger in the body for as long as 10 to 12 hours after consumption. For people who are sensitive to caffeine, it’s a good idea to stop drinking coffee after lunch or at least six hours before going to bed. Alcohol can also disrupt your sleep. Recent research indicates that while a nightcap might make you drowsy at first, it may also cause you to wake up during the night and leave you feeling sleep-deprived the next day.
Think positive thoughts. Getting to sleep is difficult when you feel anxious or stressed-out. Try thinking three positive thoughts (or think about three things you are grateful for) right before going to sleep. This puts you in a more relaxed frame of mind.
Go to sleep earlier. The amount of sleep needed differs from person to person. If your goal is to become an early riser but you still need a full eight hours of rest, call it a night earlier.
In the Morning
The Snooze button is not your friend. What’s wrong with hitting the Snooze button for a few more minutes of precious sleep? The fact is, an extra 10- or 15-minute snooze time produces no beneficial REM sleep and often leaves you feeling groggier than when you woke to the first alarm. It’s also habit-forming, which makes it easy to keep hitting that button again and again.
Put the alarm clock out of easy reach. There’s a huge difference between turning your alarm clock off while you’re lying in bed and having to get up to silence it because it’s ringing across the room. Once you’re up, you’re less likely to go back to sleep.
Wake up to daylight. It feels good to wake up to the sun. Leave your drapes or blinds partially open to let in the morning rays. If that’s not practical, set a timer on a lamp to illuminate your room at the desired hour.
Drink water. When we first wake up, we’re at our most dehydrated. Drinking an eight ounce glass of water gets your body systems moving and ready for the day ahead.
Start doing stuff! An active early-morning routine builds momentum for the rest of your workday. To get your blood flowing, do some stretching or jumping exercises. Walk to the local coffeehouse. Feed your dog or cat early, after which your furry friend will remind you every day when it’s time to be fed.

North Sound                                       South Sound
2802 Wetmore Ave, Suite 212           33530 1st Way S, Suite 102
Everett, WA 98201                             Federal Way, WA 98003
425.339.2400                                     253.237.0751
fax 425.259.1099                               fax 253.237.0701

Saturday, August 3, 2013

Seven Tax Tips for Students with a Summer Job -

Is your child a student with a summer job? Here's what you should know about the income your child earns over the summer.
  1. All taxpayers fill out a W-4 when starting a new job. This form is used by employers to determine the amount of tax that will be withheld from your paycheck. Taxpayers with multiple summer jobs will want to make sure all their employers are withholding an adequate amount of taxes to cover their total income tax liability. To make sure your child's withholding is correct, call our office.

  2. Whether you are working as a waiter or a camp counselor, you may receive tips as part of your summer income. All tip income you receive is taxable and is therefore subject to federal income tax.

  3. Many students do odd jobs over the summer to make extra cash. If this is your situation, keep in mind that earnings you receive from self-employment are subject to income tax. This includes income from odd jobs like baby-sitting and lawn mowing.

  4. If you have net earnings of $400 or more from self-employment, you also have to pay self-employment tax. (Church employee income of $108.28 or more must also pay.) This tax pays for your benefits under the Social Security system. Social Security and Medicare benefits are available to individuals who are self-employed just as they are to wage earners who have Social Security tax and Medicare tax withheld from their wages. The self-employment tax is figured on Form 1040, Schedule SE.

  5. Subsistence allowances paid to ROTC students participating in advanced training are not taxable. However, active duty pay - such as pay received during summer advanced camp - is taxable.

  6. Special rules apply to services you perform as a newspaper carrier or distributor. You are a direct seller and treated as self-employed for federal tax purposes if you meet the following conditions:
    • You are in the business of delivering newspapers.
    • All your pay for these services directly relates to sales rather than to the number of hours worked.
    • You perform the delivery services under a written contract which states that you will not be treated as an employee for federal tax purposes.

  7. Generally, newspaper carriers or distributors under age 18 are not subject to self-employment tax.
A summer work schedule is sometimes a patchwork of odd jobs - which makes for confusion come tax time. Contact us if you have any questions at all about income your child earned this summer season.


North Sound                                       South Sound
2802 Wetmore Ave, Suite 212           33530 1st Way S, Suite 102
Everett, WA 98201                             Federal Way, WA 98003
425.339.2400                                     253.237.0751
fax 425.259.1099                               fax 253.237.0701