Thursday, March 15, 2012

Failing To Pay Employment Taxes Means Personal Liability (Forbes)

 - Article originally published on Forbes.com by Robert Wood - 03/13//2012

 Employers have a duty to withhold taxes from employees. That’s one reason the IRS likes employees better than independent contractors. The IRS gets its tax money sooner and more reliably by withholding, causing some people to believe that someday everyone will be an employee.
If the employer withholds the tax money but doesn’t hand it over to the IRS, it means big penalties. It also means personal liability even if you didn’t benefit from the money. The IRS rarely accepts excuses.
In a cash-strapped business, you might think there are more important obligations, but taxes should be at the top of your list. When you withhold tax money but fail to give it to the IRS, they will come after you. Quite rightly, the IRS views it as government money, a trust fund belonging to the IRS.
The IRS takes a tough stance and the courts usually go along. A recent example is Kobus v. U.S., where the U.S. Court of Federal Claims agreed Kobus was a “responsible person” personally liable when payroll taxes went missing. Kobus claimed he wasn’t willful, saying he didn’t know taxes weren’t paid and the corporation had no funds.
Kobus owned Village Turf, a landscaping business that expanded into a retail store. Kobus hired others to handle details such as payroll taxes. By the time of the retail expansion he hired a manager to run the business. Escalating tax-collection activities lead Kobus to ask the manager to investigate. Kobus claimed the manager was to handle all taxes but the manager denied it.
Claiming he was innocent of wrongdoing, Kobus said he had no knowledge taxes weren’t being paid. The IRS said even if that was true, Kobus was reckless. Since Village Turf was paying creditors, it could have paid the IRS. The court agreed Kobus was willful.
The court acknowledged that Kobus may not have had the money on hand to pay the taxes. After all, vendors held security interests requiring first payment. Nevertheless, Kobus should have found a way to pay the IRS. Besides, the court didn’t believe Kobus was so “oblivious” that he didn’t know large payroll taxes weren’t being paid.
 - Article originally published on Forbes.com by Robert Wood - 03/13//2012 

No comments:

Post a Comment